Amazon.com Widgets
The Linde

Freedom 2: Why nothing is left of Jewish Christian Faith if we are not free | Josef Seifert
Tags: christian faith, freedom, personalism

1. Without acknowledging freedom of the created person, God would be the origin of all evils and thus a hyper-demonic being: Each metaphysics, which denies the freedom of humans and of angels, and more precisely the abuse of freedom, as source and first cause of all the manifold evils that obviously exist in the world blames these evils on God or, if he is an atheist, on an unfree natural cause. In either of these two cases moral evil would not exist at all in humans. Because if humans and angels were determined to be evil, they would be innocent like lambs or like puppets; God, however, as long as his existence is not altogether denied, as the source of all evil and suffering, would be himself evil. Therefore each denying of human and angelic freedom either leads to atheism or to polytheism, or to a transformation of God into a super-demon (infinitely more terrible than Satan, because all evils from the beginning to the end of the world would be God’s fault alone, which cannot be said of Satan. In contrast to Satan’s limited causal role regarding other evils besides his own). If man and angels were not free and if therefore, granted his existence, God had brought into the world all meanness, all lies, all adulteries, all perjuries, rapes, murders, thefts, tortures, hate and envy, genocide and other crimes (including Satan’s and his angels’ sins) or if He had determined angels and humans to commit them, He would be the only ultimate source of evil (which cannot be said of Lucifer). One cannot imagine a more terrible destruction of the idea of God. God would be an Anti-God. In this case, Ivan Karamazov’s rebellion against God as responsible for all evils would be wholly justified.

2. Without divine freedom there could not be any contingent world and particularly no created free person: The origin of non-necessary beings in the world, and particularly of created free agents, could not be explained without creation being a free act of God, because a contingent and temporal world cannot proceed from God by a necessity rooted in the eternal and necessary divine nature but only from a free divine choice, and even more clearly: never could unfree causes in nature or in God explain the wonder of a free will in finite beings. Freedom in the world can come into being only from a free act of the absolute Being. Therefore, if God were not free, neither the contingent (non-necessarily existent) world nor free agents in it could exist. Therefore, do deny God’s freedom of choice, still retaining His existence, will lead to some form of pantheism that dissolves human personhood and freedom. Moreover, if the world and even evil flows necessarily from God, God would, if not freely, so necessarily, become the cause of evil as well, as Schelling suggests in his thesis that everything flows with absolute necessity (at least moral necessity) from God.

3. Without divine freedom there would also be no divine holiness: Each adequate idea of God implies His freedom also for another reason: as the condition and origin of His justice, mercy, and Holiness as the highest perfection of any person qua person: Without God’s supremely perfect freedom the core of divine perfection would be null. God would no longer be just, merciful and holy, and hence not God.

4. By denying divine, angelic and human freedom the entire Judeo-Christian revelation is being denied and Holy Scripture rendered a worthless book:
Without freedom, God would not be our creator, nor our redeemer, nor would there be divine forgiveness of sins, nor any reason for gratitude towards God for our creation, redemption or for the forgiveness of our sins, because if these were not works of divine free choice, they would be nothing.
Likewise without freedom of God, of angels and of humans all anthropological contents and teachings of Sacred Scripture and of the Church would lose their foundation: We would not be creatures but some moments in a necessarily self-unfolding life of God. There would be no original sin, no personal sin, no redemption from them, no meaning of the divine commandments, nor of any divine promises. The Sermon on the Mount and the call to holiness would not have any sense any more let alone eternal rewards or punishments. All talk of a purgatory, of moral conscience, of the sacraments of confession and baptism or the unction of the sick would be senseless babbling.

In a word: without freedom no Christianity! And also no Judaism and no Islam which recognize many of the same truths about God and man!
Therefore hardly any truth is more important not only for the metaphysics of the person and our personal life, but also for the Christian and any other theistic faith than this one: that the person, whether human and finite or divine and infinite, is free.

——Other entries in this series——
Freedom 1: Are we free? – Are we persons?
Freedom 3: But are we free? Five questions

Jun 10, 10:15 am

Add comment

Page 1 of 1 pages

Join our mailing list:

  

It is no ordinary matter we are discussing, Glaucon, but the right conduct of life.

Socrates, The Republic

Email the Linde

Interesting series:

Josef Seifert on the nature and importance of freedom:

Are we free? Are we persons?
Why nothing is left of Jewish Christian Faith if we are not free.
But are we free? Five questions.
What Is Freedom? Can We choose Radically Different Lives?
Inner Freedom and Cooperative Freedom
Are we really free? Can we know it?
The first three evidences for human freedom
…  to be continued

John Crosby on the philosophy of John Paul II:

Flying With Both Wings: Why Christians Need Philosophy
Worthy of Respect: The Personalist Norm
Interiority of Human Persons
Persons Are Unrepeatable
Human Freedom
Freedom and Truth
Self-Donation
Embodiment
Embodiment and Morality
10  Solidarity

The Christopher West controversy:

•  The Nightline interview that started it all
•  Alice von Hildebrand's critique
•  David Schindler's critique
•  Fr. Angelo Geiger weighs in
•  A word by West himself
•  Janet Smith's defense
•  Michael Waldstein's defense
•  Schindler responds to Smith and Waldstein
•  Janet Smith's second counter
•  Fr. Angelo Geiger weighs in a 2nd time
•  West's response to the controversy

Find lectures by Healy and West in our downloads section, or listen to specific topics:
- the JPII - Hefner comparison
- prudishness
- concupiscence
- on sexual intimacy as self-revealing

Tags (i.e. topics):

abortionabortion survivalalinskyangeranimal rightsapartheidapprehensionarchbishop chaputauthenticityayn randbenjamin franklinbureaucracyburqacall to lovecare for the soulcaritas in veritatecaryll houselandercentral planningcharitycharles taylorchild brideschild psychologychildrenchristian faithchristmaschristopher caldwellchristopher westcivilitycloningclosed postscoercioncolonialismcommunioncommunismcommunityconcupiscenceconjugal loveconjugal rightsconscienceconscience and super-egoconservatismcourtshipcriticismcrosbycultish tendenciesculturedamien of molokaidavid brooksde lubacdeferencedietrich von hildebranddignity of womendreyfus affairdysfunctionecumenismedith steineducationeinsteinembryonic stem cell researchemotionemotional drynessemptinessenvironmentalismetiquetteexpertisefatherhoodfaultsfoolsforgivenessfrankensteinfreedomfreedom of religionfriendshipfulton sheengeorge weigelgianna jessengift of selfgoofygratitudehans jonashappinesshardwiringhealth carehealyhefnerhugh hefnerhuman rightsideologyillative senseimmigrationincarnationindividualismindividualityinnocenceinstitutional failureintimacyintimidationiranislamjansenismjason berryjohn cagejohn paul iijosef seifertjournalismjust warjusticekierkegaardkoranlawlerlegion of christleon podlesliberalismlonelinesslovemanipulationmao tse tungmark henriemark twainmarriagemarriage debtmartin luther kingmartyrdommary eberstadtmaureen dowdmercymetaphysicsmid-life crisismodernitymodestymohammedmother teresamotivationmovie recommendationsnewmannewman's conversionnfpnon-violencenostalgiaobamaobjectification of womenobjectivity of truthopen discussionoppressionpassivitypaternalismpatrick o'brianpavperfectionpersonpersonal dignitypersonal well-beingpersonalismpersonspersons and powerpet peevephallic symbolspluralismplutopolandpopulation controlpornographypostmodernismpro-lifeprojectionprudishnesspurityrational animalreaganrecommendationsrecordingsrelativismreligionretreatrevelationright to ignorancerights of womenroger scrutonromanticismrome conferenceronald knoxronda chervinsadnesssandro magistersciencescientismself-possessionselfhoodsexsex abusesex abuse scandalsexual moralitysexual revolutionsexualitysheena duncansocialized medicinesolidaritysolitudesteven kellmeyerstevenson

Recent posts:

•  It is not good for man to be alone (7)
•  Resisting the objectification women (3)
•  Von Hildebrand conference in Rome 
•  Karol Wojtyla, great gift to the world 
•  Von Hildebrand conference in Rome 
•  The enemy within 
•  “The emperor’s new clothes” put to music! (5)
•  Sheena Duncan, RIP 
•  Protecting children 
•  Legion of Christ taken to task (2)
•  Religion of Peace? (2)
•  Theological virtues don’t obviate the claims of natural justice 
•  Privacy for animals 
•  Megan McArdle on marriage 
•  Mark Twain on marriage 
•  Husbands, love your wives (3)
•  Splitting the moral atom 
•  Midlife care for the soul 
•  Poland 
•  Personal responsibility or paternalism? 
•  Child brides 
•  Hatred of the Church 
•  Personal encounter with God the center of true faith 
•  Power corrupts 
•  The Dreyfus affair and clerical sex abuse 
•  Recommended reading 
•  Scruton on giving 
•  Penitence 
•  The priority of the personal in human happiness 
•  The personification of evil (3)
•  John Allen on Benedict’s handling of the issue (14)
•  Weigel on the sex scandals in the Church (1)
•  What is criticism? (1)
•  What is conscience? (52)
•  The nanny becomes a bully 
•  Power vs. service 
•  the de-personalizing Legion of Christ (1)
•  Christians in public 
•  Satanism in the Vatican (3)
•  Freedom has to come from within (4)
•  Al Qaida calls for more murder 
•  Intimidation vs. freedom in religion 
•  Son of Hamas fingers Allah as the source of Islamic terror 
•  Josef Seifert calls on PAV President to step down (4)
•  Intimacy without love: an illustration 
•  Bill Buckley on the morality of the last days 
•  Intimacy without love damages the spirit (24)
•  Kleist’s take on modernity (5)
•  Lenten Reading 
•  Christian and Islamic visions of love 
•  Conflating toughness and bullying (1)
•  Ayn Rand’s false philosophy (2)
•  Gift and grateful striving: Personalist Insight of the Day (PID) (2)
•  The curse and the gift of being Irish (2)
•  Defeating corruption 
•  Equality of persons 
•  A must see documentary on person-destroying ideologies 
•  From Pope Benedict 
•  Mugged by the ultrasound (2)
•  The Gospel of Life 
•  Martin Luther King, Jr., personalist 
•  What makes you suffer? 
•  Nancy Pelosi’s Archbishop explains the meaning of freedom 
•  The beginning of love 
•  The moral vacuum in western world makes Islam appealing to women (3)
•  Between the knockers and boosters of modern culture (2)
•  Christmas reading and listening recommendations (1)
•  The Incarnation: the glorification of humanity 
•  A sign of hope 
•  The marriage debt (2)
•  On not wanting reality 
•  Weigel on just war theory 
•  Environmentalism’s assault on persons 
•  Apprehension vs. seeing 
•  Cloning and the right to ignorance (2)
•  Ecclesiastical dysfunction 
•  Criticizing modernity (2)
•  Sexual revolution coming under fire from former liberals 
•  Communion (9)
•  Stigma and motivation 
•  Von Hildebrand on gratitude 
•  The role of philosophy (3)
•  Thanksgiving as an interpersonal act 
•  Personalism in education administration (2)
•  The origins of religion 
•  An anger image 
•  Why a theology of the body? (3)
•  Great movies about life behind the wall (2)
•  The fall of the wall 
•  Continuing the TOB discussion (45)
•  Christopher West breaks silence; answers critics (75)
•  Scientific evidence for the importance of fathers 
•  Why Benedict did what he did 
•  Two views on children 
•  Moral bankruptcy among the elites (1)
•  Recommendation reading and viewing about China under Mao 
•  The big difference between Mother Teresa and Mao Tse Tung (2)
•  Man: the dressing animal (3)
•  Scientistic dogmatism vs. God and human dignity 
•  Remembering two great personalists