Only posts tagged with: Conscience | Display all
Jan. 27 at 9:16am
It's always jarring to hear moral indignation and moral terminology being deployed in the defense of moral evil. Here is National Organization for Women President, Terry O'Neill, answering a reporter's question about whether the President has a right to dictate that faithful Catholics pay for emplyees' contraception and sterilizations through their health care plans. In fact, she asserts righteously, President Obama has "an obligation" to force them.
One can't listen without feeling,
1) that this is a wretchedly unhappy woman.
2) that she supposes she has just delivered a crushingly dispositive argument instead of a steaming mass of moral confusion.
But, the state of culture and …
continue readingMar. 25, 2010, at 4:12pm
See below for the 5th and last part of the comments elicited by Katie's post on ConscienceMar. 25, 2010, at 3:12pm
See below for the 4th part of the comments elicited by Katie's post on ConscienceMar. 25, 2010, at 2:12pm
See below for the 3rd part of the comments elicited by Katie's post on ConscienceMar. 25, 2010, at 1:12pm
See below for the 2nd part of the comments elicited by Katie's post on ConscienceMar. 25, 2010, at 12:12pm
A friendly behind-the-scenes dispute with a Linde reader on the topic of religious liberty has reminded me once again how widespread is the confusion about the nature of conscience in our day. Many take it to be nothing other than a license for religious and moral subjectivism. The duty to act according to conscience is twisted into a right to do whatever I want so long as I don’t see anything wrong with it.
So when a traditionalist Catholic hears someone (like me) claiming (as I do) that religious liberty is an imperative of human dignity, he thinks he is hearing a defense of relativism. When I say (following Newman) that conscience is the voice of God speaking in the human soul, he …
continue readingJan. 14, 2010, at 12:29pm
His excellency, George H. Niederauer, Archbishop of San Francisco, has published a letter to Nancy Pelosi laying out the Church’s teaching on freedom and conscience. I find it very well done.
Freedom of will is the capacity to act with moral responsibility; it is not the ability to determine arbitrarily what constitutes moral right.
In reminding his readers of the objectivity of moral values, the Archbishop stresses not so much the binding character of the law as given by the Church, but rather the reality of conscience as the “core of the person” and the locus of his interior encounter with God. In other words, the Church teaches us not so much to “obey authority” as to …
continue reading
Mailinglist:
Subscribe:
Reading circles:
Podcasts:
Re: “Forgiving Oneself”—What Might It Mean?
By: Hermitess21C
Re: Deceit and coercion: different means, same end
By: Laurence
Re: “Forgiving Oneself”—What Might It Mean?
By: Teresa Manidis
Re: “Forgiving Oneself”—What Might It Mean?
Re: “Forgiving Oneself”—What Might It Mean?
By: Hermitess21C
Re: “Forgiving Oneself”—What Might It Mean?
By: Teresa Manidis
Re: “Forgiving Oneself”—What Might It Mean?
By: Teresa Manidis
Re: “Forgiving Oneself”—What Might It Mean?
By: Gregory Borse
Re: “Forgiving Oneself”—What Might It Mean?
By: Michael Healy
Recently active posts:
Latest comments: