Only posts tagged with: Pro-life | Display all
Jan. 23 at 9:40am
The 39th sorrowful anniversary of Roe vs. Wade is a good occasion for high-lighting an important paper by friend and fellow personalist, Peter J. Colosi. In it he cautions pro-lifers against a growing trend in the movement, viz. a too exclusive reliance on empirical science to the neglect of deeper, philosophical issues. He freely grants that scientific developments making it undisputably evident that even the tiniest zygote is a distinct and absolutely unique human being have been a great benefit to our cause.
continue readingNonetheless, the trend to use the force of that argument as the sole argument is dangerous, for it tends to miss important dimensions of reality related to the meaning of …
Mailinglist:
Subscribe:
Reading circles:
Podcasts:
Re: “Forgiving Oneself”—What Might It Mean?
By: Hermitess21C
Re: Deceit and coercion: different means, same end
By: Laurence
Re: “Forgiving Oneself”—What Might It Mean?
By: Teresa Manidis
Re: “Forgiving Oneself”—What Might It Mean?
Re: “Forgiving Oneself”—What Might It Mean?
By: Hermitess21C
Re: “Forgiving Oneself”—What Might It Mean?
By: Teresa Manidis
Re: “Forgiving Oneself”—What Might It Mean?
By: Teresa Manidis
Re: “Forgiving Oneself”—What Might It Mean?
By: Gregory Borse
Re: “Forgiving Oneself”—What Might It Mean?
By: Michael Healy
Recently active posts:
Latest comments: